Just for clarification: even if Record-Route is not necessary for REGISTER, should be harmless and should not affect routing of subsequent requests, because Record-Route is not saved in location.
Cheers, Daniel
On 20.07.17 20:06, E. Schmidbauer wrote:
don't add recordroute on the register packet that is being forwarded to FreeSWITCH add_path_received(); rtpproxy_manage("cw"); # record_route(); <- this line
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Iskren Hadzhinedev <iskren.hadzhinedev@ikiji.com mailto:iskren.hadzhinedev@ikiji.com> wrote:
Hi Alex, Don't believe so, it's a very minimal configuration; its contents are below. Thanks for your input! mpath = "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so" loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" loadmodule "path.so" loadmodule "dispatcher.so" loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "rtpproxy.so" #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG loadmodule "debugger.so" #!endif modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("path", "use_received", 1) modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)") modparam("nathelper", "nortpproxy_str", "a=sdpmangled:yes\r\n") modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.sock") #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG modparam("debugger", "cfgtrace", 1) #!endif #----- Routing -----# route { if (!sanity_check()) { exit; } if ( !mf_process_maxfwd_header("10") ) { sl_send_reply("483","To Many Hops"); xlog("L_NOTICE", "$si $rm $ru -- too many hops\n"); exit; } force_rport(); if (!ds_is_from_list("1")) { # SIP request packet client->backend if( !loose_route() ) { if( !ds_select_dst("1", "1") ) { # TODO: Handle gracefully once everything works fine drop(); } } if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (method=="REGISTER") { fix_nated_register(); } else { fix_nated_contact(); } } add_path_received(); rtpproxy_manage("cw"); record_route(); } else { # SIP request packet backend->client loose_route(); rtpproxy_manage("cw"); record_route(); } forward(); } onreply_route { if(!ds_is_from_list("1")) { # SIP reply packet client->backend fix_nated_contact(); rtpproxy_manage("cw"); } else { # SIP reply packet backend->client rtpproxy_manage("cw"); } return(1); } Kind regards, Iskren On 20.7.2017 г. 18:20, Alex Balashov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:18:18PM +0300, Iskren Hadzhinedev wrote:
doesn't use the 'received' parameter and it forwards to the RFC1918 IP address. The initial INVITE from FreeSWITCH has the following headers: To: <sip:1001@192.168.1.200:5063> Route: <sip:1.2.3.4>;lr;received=sip:5.6.7.8:5063
Is there any possibility that your Kamailio config strips Route headers from initial invites? The stock config ships this way. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users