13 Jan
2010
13 Jan
'10
1:58 a.m.
Raúl-
Thanks Raúl... we'll change the registration and re-test.
-Jeff
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 17:46:15 Vikram Ragukumar
wrote:
This is a customer requirement, otherwise we wouldn't do it. The customer wants the
Asterisk server and some other
servers on a different LAN segment. We can remove the bridge for testing.
Daniel,
Thank you for your reply.
-----------------------
| CentOS5.4 | -----------
-------- | ---- --- ---- | | CentOS5.4 |
|Internet|--|eth0|---|br0|---|eth1|----| Asterisk |
-------- | ---- --- ---- | -----------
| Kamailio + rtpproxy |
-----------------------
br0 has a static Public IPv4 address a.b.c.d, and acts as a bridge
between eth0 and eth1. Both eth0 and eth1 do not have IPv4 addresses.
Why did you use a bridge interface (br0) between Kamailio and Asterisk ? ...
did you know that you will overload your kamailio machine without need .. ? The box
running Asterisk also has a public IPv4 address a.b.c.e
The default config file for Kamailio Kamailo.cfg has been edited to
include Nat and mysql support. I need Kamailio to function as a proxy by
forwarding all SIP signaling information to Asterisk.
For that you don't need a bridge interface
Rtpproxy is started using
rtpproxy -l a.b.c.d -s udp:127.0.0.1:7722 -r /var/log -a
-S /root/rtpproxy
then Kamailio is started to listen on 127.0.0.1:5060 and a.b.c.d:5060
I make a test call using x-lite softphone registered with Asterisk,
however rtpproxy does not seem to record the session at all. I have
checked the directory to make sure the permissions are alright.
If your softphone is directly registered agains Asterisk, and not to your
kamailio server ... Kamailio will not handle the signaling, so it will never
instruct rtpproxy to do anything.