7 Jun
2007
7 Jun
'07
12:02 p.m.
I'm not sure whether this functionality has been done in purpouse. I would
like the coder who made it to explain the reason why it is different and
only in the case there's no special reason, track it.
Samuel.
2007/6/7, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com>om>:
Please register as 2.0 issue on http://tracker.iptel.org/
g-)
samuel wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for stepping so late in this post but I am facing exactly the same
"issue" and would like to call for attention from other SER 2.0 rc2
users/developers.
Whenever you try to load from RADIUS user class attributes, for example
with
radius_load_attr("$tu","(a)to.uri")
you get in radius only
User-Name = "sip:sam@test.voip.com"
SER-Service-Type=Get-User-Attrs.
In case you want to load uri class attributes, for example with
radius_load_attr("$tr","(a)to.uri")
the Radius Request paquet has completely different contents, namely the
URI splited into 3 parameters SER-URI-Scheme = "sip"
User-Name = "sam"
SER-DID = "test.voip.com"
This double format complicates unnecessarily, at least for me, radius
configuration or forces you to do some "dirty", at least for me, tricks in
order to get in the User-Name paramenter the same value so you onlyhave ONE
USER DEFINITION in radius config and not all the possible combinations it
may appear...Remember you can call load_user_attr with different arguments
(@ruri,@to,@ to.uri,(a)to.uri,username,....) and it will end up being a
complete mess.
I would therefore like to standardize both methods so the same data is
expected in radius or that someone explain why this different methods are
required.
Thanks to all!!!
Samuel.
P.D. I'm a radius newbie, using FreeRadius, and may be there are clean
ways to configure RADIUS so both Access-Requests are handled in a ellegant
way requiring you to have only one user definition.
2007/3/12, tzieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)o2.pl>pl>:
Hi
Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to
radius it has the following contents:
SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip"
User-Name = "hellboy"
SER-DID = " voip.rd.touk.pl"
SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs
NAS-Port = 0
NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following:
User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl"
SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs
NAS-Port = 0
NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID?
Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and
hellboy.
Bests
Tomasz
Access-Request from ser
being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see
an avp value to appear in ser.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> tzieleniewski wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius
has the
following shape:
> > Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007
> > Packet-Type = Access-Request
> > User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl"
> > SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs
> > NAS-Port = 0
> > NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
> >
> > the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password.
> > so do I understand right that radius in such case should be
configured
in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type =
Get-User-Attrs?
> >
> That's correct.
> > Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put
into
the particular track and class?
> >
> No prefixes.
> > Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record
and
the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
>
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the I did such a check:
dump_attrs();
radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri");
dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius:
SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip"
User-Name = "tomix"
SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org"
SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs
NAS-Port = 0
NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered:
Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997
SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to
track,
why is that, what do I missed?
debug output:
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560:
track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP
present
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix(a)tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]:
radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> < sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540:
class=GLOBAL
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560:
track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]:
AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP
present
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix(a)tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests
Tomasz
>
> Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer
avp.
> It is the responsibility of the RADIUS
server to return the correct
set
of AVP
dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser).
g-)
> Thank you in advance
> Best
> Tomasz
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers