I would say rtpproxy as I use it and have had not problems (other than of my own doing...) ;) - also it can handle many more calls. Seriously - mediaproxy is probably a nicer solution as you can see in-progress calls etc. It would be very nice to add this to rtpproxy (which it looks that portaone may have done already as they say in thier docs that they can show active channels now). I wish they would also release this bit of functionality...
Noel
Iqbal wrote:
I would say mediaproxy..have little logical reason except that so far no NAT issues with any client
Iqbal
Giovanni Balasso wrote:
Alle 21:21, sabato 19 novembre 2005, a cairo ha scritto:
Terrible question: Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
Private Network for more than 1000 users Public SER SERVER Public Radius+MySQL Public Patton MediaGW
If users are all in private network stun can create hairpin problem but you should be able to run ser without stun, mediaproxy or rtpproxy.
If you have external clients and need to run some kind of proxy, surf onsip.org for details on mediaproxy vs rtpproxy
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers