Hello Alex,
Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand this behavior.
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 22:07 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> пише:
Branches are a creature of transactions. It follows
that “branch flags”
are transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to
the transaction as a whole.
ACKs constitute a separate transaction.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Then.. I don't know, lol
But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions
(depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role
here.
Good luck.
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have
different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which
can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly
*setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different
branches independently.
Thank you!
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> пише:
I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a
transaction? If so, you'd need
to use *setflag*/*isflagset*
Cheers.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець <
volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions
*isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :)
Here is what I do:
1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of
available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding
*setbflag("17",
$T_branch_idx);* there.
2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17",
$T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true*
(for same INVITE).
3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK
packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*.
So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since
it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly?
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users