Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy

Hi Maxim, I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3. The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even though the SDP is rewritten properly. My test setup is like this: UA1(192.168.1.10) -- SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15) I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files. 1. success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186 2. fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186 3. success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1 4. fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1 Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this. Thanks, Ricardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy >Folks, > >Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would >be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, >because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP >proxy itself can be downloaded from: > >https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/ > >Any feedback is greatly appreciated. > >-Maxim >P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease >please apply the following patch: > >https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers