30 Sep
2008
30 Sep
'08
10:33 a.m.
Hello,
On 09/30/08 16:10, Alex Hermann wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
the nat might not lose the mappings. Let me give
an example where i
encountered a real need for this. Some time ago mobile phones starting
introducing sip phone applications to connect via wifi. It happened many
time that they crash and upon reboot they asked a new stun and got new
binding port, while the old contact was still valid. If registration
time is long enough could happen to have several contacts in location
table but only one valid. kamailio/openser was forking, of course the
right branch was answered, still, extra resources were used.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
to deal with some
broken NAT/STUN devices, when you are sure there is a single phone, but
each registration gets with a new port for each register refresh.
How usefull is this? How do you get packets from the outside through the NAT
if the NAT is losing its mappings