10 Jun
2008
10 Jun
'08
6:44 p.m.
Hi All
I had a lot of problems with STUN and symmetric NAT. The thing is that
it does not always work with symmetric NAT. That would be mostly routers
based on Linux IPTABLES.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei
Iancu
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:42 AM
To: pezhman_lali(a)yahoo.com
Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] stun
Hi Pezhman,
If I'm not wrong STUN cannot cross symmetric nats - it is one of its
limitations.
Regards,
Bogdan
Pezhman Lali wrote:
--- On Mon, 6/9/08, Pezhman Lali <pezhman_lali(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From: Pezhman Lali
<pezhman_lali(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: stun
To: pezhman.lali(a)gmail.com
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 6:02 PM
Dear,
does setting the ip of stun server in the sip-phones,
behind the symmetric nat, make the problem ?
my experience with stund 0.96, said yes.
the stun server, can detects the type of nats properly, but
the sip-phones behind the un-symmetric nat, can not
register, or one-way calling.
????
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users