Hello,
can you check the expires column in presentity table. The issue might be accumulation of too many dialog-info documents, due to large expires interval, taken from the default lifetime of the dialog. You can change that with:
- http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/pua_dialoginfo.html#idp257695...
Cheers, Daniel
On 30/01/15 16:43, Nuno Reis wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thanks for answering me back. I'll follow the exact procedures from here: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory and will let you know about my exact finding soon.
Cheers,
--
*Nuno Miguel Reis*| *Unified Communication**Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nreis@wavecom.pt mailto:nreis@wavecom.pt
WAVECOM-Soluções Rádio, S.A. Cacia Park | Rua do Progresso, Lote 15 3800-639 AVEIRO | Portugal T. +351 309 700 225 | F. +351 234 919 191 *GPS http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=202333747613191340808.0004b4b227a6144f0df88 | www.wavecom.pt http://www.wavecom.pt/**http://www.wavecom.pt/*
Description: Description: WavecomSignature http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/wavecom/premios.php
Publicity http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/mail_eventos.php
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, which memory is increasing? shared or private memory? or is system memory? Cheers, Daniel On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Nuno Reis <nreis@wavecom.pt <mailto:nreis@wavecom.pt>> wrote: Hi Juha and all. I understand that and that is what the RFC says. It seems pua module does that right. Although something is clearly not right in my production environment because kamailio memory consumption still grows pretty fast. Kamailio memory usage starts in ~500MB and after ~24H kamailio is using ~3GB. If I disable kamailio from listening on the localhost(127.0.0.1) where pua is generating the SIP Publishes kamailio just keeps around the ~500MB all the time. This is a small production environment with 70 extensions with Yealink phones. Any ideas on how to chase down this memory leak? Should I open a git issue for this one? -- *Nuno Miguel Reis*| *Unified Communication**Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nreis@wavecom.pt <mailto:nreis@wavecom.pt> WAVECOM-Soluções Rádio, S.A. Cacia Park | Rua do Progresso, Lote 15 3800-639 AVEIRO | Portugal T. +351 309 700 225 | F. +351 234 919 191 *GPS <http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=202333747613191340808.0004b4b227a6144f0df88> | www.wavecom.pt <http://www.wavecom.pt/>**<http://www.wavecom.pt/>* Description: Description: WavecomSignature <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/wavecom/premios.php> Publicity <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/mail_eventos.php> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Juha Heinanen <jh@tutpro.com <mailto:jh@tutpro.com>> wrote: Nuno Reis writes: > Here my publisher is Kamailio itself. Can someone elaborate a bit more on > this issue and maybe we can get to bottom of it? when your application issues initial publish request, it does so without SIP-If-Match header. 200 ok from presence server then contains an etag in SIP-ETag header. when your application refreshes the publish, it must place this etag in SIP-If-Match header to prevent presence server from creating a new publication. for subscribes, your application must place in re-subscribe the same event header id param as the previous one had in order for the presence server to know that subscribe was not a new subscription. -- juha -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/micond <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
