On Sep 28, 2004, at 5:30 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Sep 26, 2004 at 14:13, Michael Shuler mike@bwsys.net wrote:
I figured it out. SER apparently uses strict sub netting. A /27 is 32 IP's and 80 is not evenly divisible by 32. I changed it to /28 which is 16 IP's and since 80/16 = 5 with no remainder it now works. It would be nice if SER didn't have that limitation but its not that big of a deal because I can just put an || in the if statement.
For src_ip == ip/mask, ser does (src_ip & mask) == ip. You would like it to do: (src_ip & mask) == (ip & mask) ?
This makes more sense to me. Either that or produce an error message when parsing the ip/mask complaining about a bogus network number, or a warning stating that the statement will never match anything.
---greg
The change would be trivial, the only question is if it brings any unexpected matches. In your case x.x.x.80/27 would be equivalent to x.x.x.64/27.
Andrei
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Greg Fausak www.AddaBrand.com (US) 469-546-1265