Word.
-- This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for brevity, errors, and general sloppiness.
Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:04 PM, JR Richardson jmr.richardson@gmail.com wrote:
I am.
On 10/25/11, sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org wrote:
Send sr-users mailing list submissions to sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org
You can reach the person managing the list at sr-users-owner@lists.sip-router.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
- Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:44:06 +0200 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: 4EA78206.4060203@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Hello,
On 10/25/11 5:52 PM, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the clarrification,
On 25/10/2011 16:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
4.6. |ds_mark_dst("s")|Mark the last used address from destination set as inactive ("i"/"I"/"0"), active ("a"/"A"/"1") or probing ("p"/"P"/"2"). With this function, an automatic detection of failed gateways can be implemented. When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it will be ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'.
Above is the part that is a little misleading, it says that
"When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it will be ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'."
This, to me, means that if a gateway is in probing mode (Active-Probing) then it wont be selected in the destination set because it is in probing mode, if this is not the case then maybe the above line should read:
"When an address is marked as inactive or inactive-probing, it will be ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'."
This brings me to my next question then, how would I set the state of a destination to Inactive-Probing (state: IP) from the routing script. The ds_mark_dst() function only allows one of "a", "i", "p".
If I do a ds_mark_dst("i"), then the state changes to "IX", Inactive with no probing to tell when gateway is back up.
If I do a ds_mark_dst("i") and then right after ds_mark_dst("p"), a log is printed saying that you cannot put a destination into probing state when it is marked as inactive.
are you sure you run the devel version? There is no such case in the sources -- send me exactly the log message you get. Only when the destination is disabled the probing cannot be set, but not the same case of inactive.
Is it possible to set the state of a gateway to inactive-probing from the routing script?
Yes, it should be, no constraint in master branch source code.
Daniel
Thanks
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda