20 Mar
2007
20 Mar
'07
12:18 p.m.
Thank you for your answer!
Could you give me some more hints how to enable local user agent
together with far-end NAT working together.
One thing I should do is probalby to record route all messages so that
the whole signalling goes through SER which knows
the local IP adresses of local UA and those of the NAT'ed ones.
I have an cisco router which has an SIP handling support, so perhaps it
will be enought just to enable nathelper pinging
to sustain the NAT bindings with nated UAs and make strict port
forwarding only to SER port 5060 and rest (fixing Contact and SDP) will
be done by the router.
Do You think that this might work.
Cheers
Tomasz
Greger V. Teigre napisał(a):
If you forward like this:
Public IP ---> Private IP
You should forward port 5060 + the UDP range used in rtpproxy/mediaproxy.
Use advertised_address directive in addition to listen.
The standard getting started NAT configs assumes that you have no
local user agents, and just do far-end NAT traversal.
g-)
TZieleniewski wrote:
Hi!!
Right now I have SER based voip system but inside the local network.
I would like to enable the external internet connection.
Is it possible to realize the NAT handling but with SER-RTPProxy or
SER-MediaProxy
not with the public IP so still in the local net but with the strict
forwarding rules on the router.
where router ofcaurse has the public IP
So that for instance having SER and media proxy inside local network
but
with whole SIP traffic routed to SER and RTP to media proxy??
Is one of the above methods more recommened at the moment with ser2??
Thank you in advance
Best
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers