Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
was referring to a forking scenario:
UAC P UAS
<----------------- 180 from UAS1
<-------------- <----------------- 183
from UAS1
<--------------
<----------------- 180 from UAS2
<---x---x---x-- this will not be relayed to UAC
since a higher reply code was already sent,
so the UAS2 will not be visible
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>
>> First of all the UAC may not discover all the branches based on
>> To-tag - there might be branches that haven't sent any reply, or
>> replies were absorbed by the forking server (ex: 180 after 183 will
>> not be relayed).
>
Is this standard conform? What about
UAC P UAS
<----------------- 183 from UAS1 <--------------
???? 180 from UAS1 <--------------
Will this be forwarded?