This looks good to me.
Who has access to commit to the repo, or can grant me that access? (Unless Andrew steps out of the shadows and wants to commit it...)
I would trim the patch - remove lines 1075-1077 of sca_call_info.c:
- state = SCA_APPEARANCE_STATE_ALERTING; - break; -
and let it fall through to 183's case.
-- Jorj
On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Jorj Bauer jorj@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
I'm asking my team to regression test this in our lab - we've seen the same with 4.0.6 (and I've been talking with Polycom about it).
Andrew Mortensen, who has been maintaining this module, left Penn some months ago. Perhaps I can pick up maintenance of this module for him.
-- Jorj
From: sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org [sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of João Vitor Arruda [joao.arruda@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 11:47 AM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: [SR-Users] SCA module - sca_call_info_update() function for 180 responses
Hello all,
I've had proposed a fix to SCA module in the tracker (https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=446) but did´t hear anything about it until now.
I would appreciate some comments on that to see if its feasible to be committed or even hear for anyone else using SCA module with Polycom phones to see if they have the same issue described.
Thanks, João Vitor Arruda
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users