Hi IƱaki,
I checked the code and made test calls that span multiple profiles.
The calculus is correct.
The confusion likely arises because StartTime is printed in each
span, while it is the StartTime of the call itself and not of the span.
Finally the sum of all spans equals the duration of the call. If you
have data that contradicts this I would be happy to look at it again.
Regards,
Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi, CDRTool can calculate the price of a call involving various spans
(rates).
But it does it wrongly since the start time for each span is set to
the start
time of the call, so the price is much higher than the correct one.
An example: This is a call of more than 3 days of duration. Note that
in spans
2, 3 and 4 the "StartTime" is 2008-02-16 15:57:05 in all (the start
time of
the call), and note also that the "Duration" of spans 2, 3 and 4 are
the sum
of each span and its previous spans:
--
Span: 1
Duration: 28975 s
StartTime: 2008-02-16 15:57:05 (Europe/Madrid)
ProfileId: 01 Festivo for weekend
RateId: Reducida for 0-24h
Rate: 0.0100 / 60 s
Price: 4.8292
--
Span: 2
Duration: 115375 s <---- WRONG !!!
StartTime: 2008-02-16 15:57:05 (Europe/Madrid) <---- WRONG !!!
ProfileId: 01 Festivo for weekend
RateId: Reducida for 0-24h
Rate: 0.0100 / 60 s
Price: 19.2292
--
Span: 3
Duration: 144175 s <---- WRONG !!!
StartTime: 2008-02-16 15:57:05 (Europe/Madrid) <---- WRONG !!!
ProfileId: 01 Laboral for weekday
RateId: Reducida for 0-8h
Rate: 0.0100 / 60 s
Price: 24.0292
--
Span: 4
Duration: 229878 s <---- WRONG !!!
StartTime: 2008-02-16 15:57:05 (Europe/Madrid) <---- WRONG !!!
ProfileId: 01 Laboral for weekday
RateId: Normal for 8-22h
Rate: 0.0300 / 60 s
Price: 114.9390
--
Total: 163.0765