Oops. This is probably because those messages are for the calling
agent, which I'm running from the proxy server, which is therefore
seeing them and complaining.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:17:06PM -0500, Daniel Medina wrote:
The message dumps seem to indicate that the Cisco
gateway is sending,
as you say, messages to the proxy server with only one via header field
in it.
The messages are
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
Should ser be seeing these as errors? I thought they were part of the
RFC.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:23:51AM +0100, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> > The logs say
> >
> >ERROR: forward_msg: no 2nd via found in reply
> > (repeated a few times)
> >Outside line
> > (Indicating that the caller actually passed)
> >route[2]:SIP-to-PSTN call routed
> >ERROR: reply cannot be parsed
>
> Well, unless I see message dumps I assume that it happens what your
> log tell: someone sends a reply to proxy server with only one via
> header field in it, or other defect. (Other situatation when this may
> happen is when SER acts as a UAC, like if it generates local CANCELs,
> and replies come back after the transaction state is already gone.)
>
>
> -jiri
--
Dan