This came off a bit more harsh than I intended. I think I understand the advantage of
EVAPI in that it can initiate a command to Kamailio (thus Kamailio doesn't need to
hold the thread, possibly it doesn't need to store the message even), but it would
still be nice to have a higher level overview of how this would be achieved. Not even
example code, but more a base architecture explanation / diagram of the flow.
Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer
E: bkaufman(a)bcmone.com
SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 |
Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768
[img]<https://www.sip.us/>
[
img]<https://www.siptrunk.com/>
[
img]<https://www.flowroute.com/>
________________________________
From: Ben Kaufman via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 9:45 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Ben Kaufman <bkaufman(a)bcmone.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Again, playing Devil's advocate: Doesn't that use TCP? It feels like:
*
HTTP evil based solely on anecdotal evidence. I know you have a LOT of history, and I
don't want downplay your experience, but I'm showing empirically how this can
work, and all you fall back to is the basic "this is evil".
*
TCP based connections bad, even DB connections.
*
EVAPI: Magic cure-all, despite being inherently more complex to implement on the far end,
and complexity usually results in more failures.
Since this is now being promoted in this thread, can you provide sunlight as to why this
is golden vs something DB driven for example?
Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer
E: bkaufman(a)bcmone.com
SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 |
Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768
[img]<https://www.sip.us/>
[
img]<https://www.siptrunk.com/>
[
img]<https://www.flowroute.com/>
________________________________
From: Alex Balashov via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 8:16 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Dec 23, 2024, at 6:27 am, Stefan via sr-users
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
It looks as modules evapi and asynch could be used to build access to a service using a
messagebus.
Oh yes. This is the way.
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristes…
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions --
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!