22 Mar
2011
22 Mar
'11
9:57 p.m.
Hi Sascha,
Thanks your answer..
I'm coming from ser flavour, and need to upgrade to 3.x, then my doubt is
specifically related with ser/sip-router. Now I've already have ser binaries
(ser, sercmd, etc) and am i asking if new binaries should be named as ser* or
siprouter* based on the flavour set.
Moreover, what if it's a new installation and need only common modules and a
few of modules_s.. Then which flavour is recommended (ser or sip-router) and
which name should the main binaries have.
Again, thank you.
Claudio
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sascha Daniels wrote:
Hi.
If you use FLAVOUR=kamailio you will get kamailio, kamctl and kamdbctl
as binary.
Regards
Sascha
Am 22.03.2011 19:42, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
Hello,
What is (or should be) the binary main name when using FLAVOUR=ser,
FLAVOUR=sip-router or no FLAVOUR specified?
I'm getting "ser" as the name whatever I set to FLAVOUR var at compile
time. Is
it right? (Makefiles.defs says "ser" in these cases but not sure the intention
of the sip-router project).
I need to know the correct one to make an ebuild package for Gentoo.
Thank you for your answers..
--
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998
Bücher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de