Hi,
Thanks for you inputs. It's working fine now using min_expires.
Regards, Suvendu.
--- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Girish,
Maybe my sentence was a little too ambiguous :-). Just to rephrase: "when you use append_hf() the modification will be reflected on the message only when forwarded".
If you try your approach, it will be a discrepancy between what SER and the phones think the expire value is. SER will consider the one received in the original req. (it will ignore the new value forced from script via append_hf() ) and the client will consider the value received in reply ( the one forced from script via append_to_reply() ).
You can easily check this via "serctl ul show" and to see if the expire time is the one you force from script.
Best regards, Marian
Girish wrote:
Hello,
--- Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
when you use append_hf() the modification will not
reflect on the
message only when forwarded. So even if you add
the Expired hdr, it will
I think you meant 'will reflect'. right?
Here we use append_hf and append_to_reply to set
the expires timeout with our softphone. And
haven't noticed any problem so far. May be
append_to_reply is doing the trick.
More appropriate is to use "min_expires" registrar
parameter.
Thanks for this info. I did not know about this.
Best regards, Marian
Best Regards,
===== Girish Gopinath gr_sh2003@yahoo.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
-- Voice Sistem http://www.voice-sistem.ro
________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony