Hi David,
First of all leaving kamilio is not about local_route - more or less the decisions to stop some useful work based on some arguments with no technical values, the whole story with SVN (now is frozen, now it is not - decision taken by 3 people) where just the last drops to fill in the glass.
Based on the how the things were going in the last 10 month, I saw no future. I really do not want to wast 7 year work (on SER and openSER) just because other people like to do politics instead of technical work with the project. When I was wasting more effort with politics than with the development, it was clear that the current way of running the project is wrong.
And as a small note: local_route is not experimental in OpenSIPS - is it a first step in building more interesting feature. There were things fixed (there were quickly imported in kamilio :D), but what we have in 1.4.1 is the first version - work is still in progress for enhancing it.
Regards, Bogdan
David Villasmil wrote:
IMO, although it seems like Bodgan has founded reasons to be upset, in the end the local_route made its way into the release, even if it made it as an "experimental feature".
Have a good one all,
David.
P.S.: "Can't we all just get along?" hehe, just kidding
That thread is very illustrative.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Granig <agranig@sipwise.com mailto:agranig@sipwise.com> wrote:
Guys, I don't have any insights in what's going on on the board, but isn't the board supposed to prevent that one single guy can make decisions which influence the overall project like that? Aren't you, Adrian, as a board member, supposed to stand up and take your chance to speak out loud that something is going THAT wrong? And if you did, and your voice wasn't heard due to this high S/N ratio because of some discussions about some features or whatever, why didn't anybody else on the board complain? I'm just a little bit suspicious about one person pointing fingers at somebody else on the board, when there are (supposed to be) a couple of other parties who should represent the project, who didn't really complain or didn't stand up by now to explain the whole situation that is going on on the board? Bogdan complained about being overruled by the board in different kind of things (from a technical and from a management point of view), and well, that happens in a project being lead by a couple of parties. But what I really miss is the other side of the story, like why the decisions where made as they were made. And the fact, that another board member puts down his vote like that (demanding that another board member quits) is not a sign of democracy. So maybe something is really going wrong on the board? Just my thoughts? Andreas Adrian Georgescu wrote: > Hello, > > Because of sheer incompetence and abuse conduct of one of the recently > adopted board members I decided to put my activities as a management > board member of OpenSER/Kamailio project on hold. > > I will be able to resume my activities after the voluntary leave of > Henning Westerholt. > > For those who do not know who I am, I was involved with OpenSER from > Day 0 of its inception. > > Kind regards, > Adrian > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org> > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users