UA2 is not RFC 3264 compliant. On a SDP offer from UA1 it has to answer with
SDP answer. Open a bug report at the vendor of UA2.
Regards
Nils Ohlmeier
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 08:33, tcchan wrote:
Dear All,
I encountered a UA that behave as follow:
UA1 call UA2
UA1 ---- invite with SDP -----> UA2
UA1 <------OK with SDP --------UA2
UA1 hold the call,
UA1 ------invite (hold) ------>UA2
UA1 <--------OK but not SDP ---UA2
UA1 unhold the call
UA1 ------invite ----------->UA2
UA1 <-------OK but also no SDP---UA2
I found that most ATA(UA) would attached a SDP when reply an OK whether
the call is hold or unhold. But there is one ATA that does not (UA2).
I noticed that some ATA--Linksys (UA1) would send a BYE to UA2 if it
receive a OK with no SDP in the hold case.
My Question is :
Is UA2 behave according to RFC?
Would deeply appreciate if someone could let me know the answer as I
always have trouble reading RFCs...
Thanks fot any help available.
Regards,
TC Chan
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers