9 Mar
2005
9 Mar
'05
12:36 a.m.
No, there is no special case for REGISTER messages in loose_route. If
you want to ignore Route header fields in REGISTER messages then do not
call loose_route function.
Jan.
On 03-03 10:07, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi all.
Does anyone know if the loose_route() function returns FALSE for
REGISTER messages that erroneously happen to contain Route headers?
In other words, do I have to do this:
route {
# sanity checks
if (method!="REGISTER") record_route();
if (loose_route() && method!="REGISTER") { <-------Is This
Necessary???
# handle loose routing
break;
}
# Normal processing
}
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers