Re: [Serusers] Does loose_route ignore REGISTER messages with <Route> Headers?

No, there is no special case for REGISTER messages in loose_route. If you want to ignore Route header fields in REGISTER messages then do not call loose_route function.

Jan.

On 03-03 10:07, Java Rockx wrote:

Hi all.

Does anyone know if the loose_route() function returns FALSE for REGISTER messages that erroneously happen to contain Route headers?

In other words, do I have to do this:

route {

# sanity checks

if (method!="REGISTER") record_route();

if (loose_route() && method!="REGISTER") { <-------Is This Necessary??? # handle loose routing break; }

# Normal processing }

Regards, Paul

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers