for example, allow_source_address() executes next function:
int match_addr_hash_table(struct addr_list** table, unsigned int group,
ip_addr_t *addr, unsigned int port)
{
struct addr_list *np;
str addr_str;
avp_value_t val;
addr_str.s = (char*)addr->u.addr;
addr_str.len = 4;
for (np = table[perm_hash(addr_str)]; np != NULL; np = np->next) {
if ( (np->grp == group)
&& ((np->port == 0) || (np->port == port))
&& ip_addr_cmp(&np->addr, addr)) {
if (tag_avp.n && np->tag.s) {
val.s = np->tag;
if (add_avp(tag_avp_type|AVP_VAL_STR, tag_avp, val) != 0) {
LM_ERR("setting of tag_avp failed\n");
return -1;
}
}
return 1;
}
}
return -1;
}
... and I see an avp being added over the tag_avp. Is it another one?
Daniel
On 06/01/14 12:59, Kelvin Chua wrote:
checking the source code, looks like, it's not
being set at all on any
of those functions
Kelvin Chua
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 04/01/14 21:47, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Kelvin Chua writes:
is the peer_tag_avp used on allow_source_address_group?
based on fast scan of permissions module source, it appears that
peer_tag_avp is set only by allow_trusted function.
the peer tag avp should be set also for allow_address() and
allow_source_address(). I don't think it is set for
allow_source_address_group().
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda