Just got a reply from a fellow SER user to add
append_branch()
fuction, but I still cannot see the INVITE from my SER.
onreply_route[1] {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n");
if (t_check_status("302")) {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "We got a 302!!!!!\n");
## Used to send INVITE message? ##
append_branch();
};
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koenig [mailto:martin.koenig@toplink-plannet.de] Sent:
Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Paul Belanger
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
Hello,
see:
looks
like Juha Heinänen has a patch for this available somewhere,
maybe he would like to share this?
Regards,
Martin
Paul Belanger schrieb:
Ya, I have looked at that one, but I can see how
it sends out the
INVITE.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koenig [mailto:martin.koenig@toplink-plannet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:09 AM
To: Paul Belanger
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
Hello,
there is this one so far:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-August/010977.html
Didn't really help...
Regards,
Martin
Paul Belanger schrieb:
> Rumor has it yes, but I have not been successful. I posted a
> question last week, and was told to search the archives. I did,
> but not much came up!
>
>
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=302+site%3Amail.iptel.org&btnG=…
> g
> le+Search&meta=
>
> I think I'm on the right track, but don't have time today to play
> with it. Here is what I got so far:
>
> #
> # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $
> #
> # simple quick-start config script
> #
>
> # ----------- global configuration parameters
> ------------------------
>
> #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
> #fork=yes
> #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
>
> debug=3
> fork=no
> log_stderror=yes
>
> check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
> dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
> rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
> #port=5060
> #children=4
> fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
>
> # ------------------ module loading
> ----------------------------------
>
> # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
> #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
>
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/xlog.so"
>
> # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
> # mysql.so must be loaded !
> #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
> #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
>
> # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters
> ---------------
>
> # -- usrloc params --
>
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
>
> # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
> # for persistent storage and comment the previous line
> #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
>
> # -- auth params --
> # Uncomment if you are using auth module
> #
> #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
> #
> # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this
> config), # uncomment also the following parameter) #
> #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
>
> # -- rr params --
> # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
> modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
>
> modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 15 )
> modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 10 )
>
> # ------------------------- request routing logic
> -------------------
>
> # main routing logic
>
> route{
>
> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
> # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> break;
> };
> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
> break;
> };
>
> # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
> # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
> # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
> # use different transport protocol
> record_route();
> # loose-route processing
> if (loose_route()) {
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
>
> # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
> # (in case, it does not work, use the following command
> # with proper names and addresses in it)
> if (uri==myself) {
>
> if (method=="REGISTER") {
> save("location");
> break;
> };
> };
>
>
> if (method=="INVITE") {
> rewritehostport("216.143.130.70:5060");
> t_on_reply("1");
> t_on_failure("1");
> t_relay();
> break;
> }
>
> }
>
> onreply_route[1] {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n");
> if (t_check_status("302")) {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "We got a 302!!!!!\n");
> ## ADD CODE TO SEND OUT INVITE!! ###
> };
> }
>
> failure_route[1] {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "Failure status %rs: Reason %rr\n"); }
>
> Let me know if you find any information.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
> Behalf Of Martin Koenig
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:00 AM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
>
>
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to take 3xx-responses in a reply_route and turn
> them into
> a new INVITE on Ser using append_branch or simliar?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org