Re: [Serusers] Remote ser management instead of FIFO

Hi Paul,

I totally agree with you that the exported set of functions is *not* the same for FIFO, UNIX socket and (you know better) for UDP/TCP socket.

Best regards, Marian

Java Rockx wrote:

Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it exceeded the 40K limit and is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same functionality as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as the actual FIFO. For instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload FIFO command doesn't work.

Regards, Paul

On 4/14/05, *Marian Dumitru* <marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro> wrote:

Hi Martin,

similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.

Best regards,
Marian

Martin Rusnak wrote:
 > Dear all,
 >
 > I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
 > the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
 > The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
 > disadvantages:
 >
 > 1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
 > 2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
 >    a new pilepine.
 >
 > Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
 > interface?
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Martin

--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers