14 Apr
2005
14 Apr
'05
3:26 p.m.
Hi Paul,
I totally agree with you that the exported set of functions is *not* the
same for FIFO, UNIX socket and (you know better) for UDP/TCP socket.
Best regards,
Marian
Java Rockx wrote:
Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it
exceeded the 40K limit
and is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same
functionality as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as
the actual FIFO. For instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload
FIFO command doesn't work.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/14/05, *Marian Dumitru* <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro
<mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro>> wrote:
Hi Martin,
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
Best regards,
Marian
Martin Rusnak wrote:
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
Dear all,
I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
disadvantages:
1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
a new pilepine.
Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
interface?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers