Re: [Users] privacy=full and contact hf

If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk. regards klaus Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: >Hi, > > >before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" >in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to >make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the >SIP requests. > >I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the > > > >>From hf and the Contact hf. >> >> >The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something >anonymous. > >The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from. > >But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, >required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to >send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would >have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again >will be rewritten to target for the meant destination. > >Is there a best practice for this item? > > > >Thanks, >Wolfgang > >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list >Users(a)openser.org >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > >