mmm smart... trying...
Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:50 PM Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com wrote:
Have you tried drop()ping the end-to-end `487 Request Terminated` reply from upstream in a failure_route, and then send_reply() in its place?
-- Alex
On 2/10/21 2:43 PM, David Villasmil wrote:
Actually I already implemented that timeout, I haven’t asked about that, because I didn’t have any problems with that one.
I am being asked for that “if a 180 comes within 0.8 seconds, cancel the call and send a 480 to the origination.
The cancel I got it working thanks to your help. Sending back a 480 to the origination is what’s proving more difficult, I just can’t figure that one out.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 19:29, Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com> wrote:
Wouldn’t it make more sense to just have an aggressive timeout for the “keeping it there” aspect? That is, if, upon receipt of a non-100 1xx message, a final dispositive reply does not follow within X seconds, route-advance to the next provider? This can be accomplished with the t_set_fr/t_reset_fr() technique previously discussed. It sounds like you might be making this unnecessarily complicated. :-) Don’t worry about how quickly they send you the progress/alerting messages; instead, worry about how slowly they send you anything else afterward. The only wrinkle I can see that in that is the caller experience... — Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.On Feb 10, 2021, at 2:13 PM, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>> wrote: Some providers have other providers which many times just answer the call and try to keep it there. It’s a known strategy some scammers use. Getting a 180/3 in say; 500ms (to a real-life hard line, is probably one such call. On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 18:52, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana <rbetancor@serlink.es <mailto:rbetancor@serlink.es>> wrote: What is the point of refusing a call that answer with a 100/183 "too quickly" ? ... I don't get the point on that. Saludos -- *Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana* Serlink Telecom S.R.L.U.
*De: *"David Villasmil" <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>> *Para: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
*Enviados: *Miércoles, 10 de Febrero 2021 9:57:35 *Asunto: *Re: [SR-Users] Time elapsed since previous message. Hello Alex, Again thanks. I'm using that calculation to, when receiving a 180/3, if it comes in too quickly (i.e. 100ms) i cancel that call, and send a 480 the the A leg. I haven't found way of doing this, is this possible at all? I trired setting a very low t_set_fr(10,10) (0 means set the default), but that's not working... Is there a way of doing this? Thanks! Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:31 PM David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Alex, Exactly what I was thinking. Just wondering whether there was a better way. Again THANKS! David On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 14:56, Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com <mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote: Hi, You can store the timestamp of the last message of interest in a transaction-persistent variable - that is, an AVP or XAVP - using $TV():https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#tv_name
<https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#tv_name%3E
Then, you can do some arithmetic like this to turn the difference between two timestamps into milliseconds. This is stolen straight from CSRP so adapt to your needs. :-) # Log request processing time. $var(cur_time) = $TV(Sn); $var(proc_diff) = ( ((( $(var(cur_time){s.select,0,.}{s.int <$(avp(proc_start){s.select,0,.}{s.int <) * 1000000) + ( $(var(cur_time){s.select,1,.}{s.int <$(avp(proc_start){s.select,1,.}{s.int <) / 1000) mod 1000 ); — Alex — Sent from my iPad On Feb 9, 2021, at 9:40 AM, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello all, Is it possible to know the elapsed time since the previously received message? On outgoing calls, I.e: when i get a 180, how long did the 100 arrived? Or the INVITE... Thanks David -- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users%3E
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users%3E
-- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> -- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>-- Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users