Re: [Users] nat flag and branch routes

I would say yes, if you do not call other functions that alter the r-uri/dst_uri, except lookup("location").

Daniel

On 08/30/05 19:43, Richard Z wrote:

Just a thought... is it possible to ingore the nat flag and just rely on the existence of dst_uri to indicate a NATed UA?

On 8/29/05, *Klaus Darilion* < klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at> wrote:

Ho Bodgan!

To use branch routes for branch-only NAT traversal also the nathelper
and mediaproxy functions must be adopted to work in branch routes.

regards
klaus

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> indeed, prior branch_route, there is only one set of flags
shared by all
> branched - that's still unchanged.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
>
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
>> Klaus Darilion writes:
>>
>> > The nat flag which will be loaded during lookup() - will it
be set
>> for > each branch so it can be queried in branch_route for all
of the
>> > registered contacts, or should I use isdsturiset() instead of
>> testing > for the NAT flag?
>>
>> i don't think that there is any changes regarding nat flag
yet.  nat
>> flag is set if any of the contacts is behind nat.  it would be
nice if
>> nat flag would be automatically set in branch route only if
contact of
>> the corresponding branch is behind nat.
>>
>> -- juha
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
<http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

---

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users