3 Aug
2004
3 Aug
'04
10:14 a.m.
Sometimes you have an unresponsive vendor.... sometimes the economics
aren't right in fixing the client... Jasomi and others have protocol
fixup solutions. If there was an easy way to drop a packet with ser,
I could fix a problem I have in my DS3 gateways with an unsupported
SIP implementation.
Jamie Yukes
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:20:10 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
<iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Serusers] How to drop 183 msg
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:00:14 +0200
From: Jason Penton <j.penton(a)ru.ac.za>
To: <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Rather than *break* the proxy try look at fixing the bad client (if of
course it is open source) - if not contact the vendor
Jason
Jamie Yukes
Global Connect http://www.gc1.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
Sent: 03 August 2004 02:46 PM
To: ks lf
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to drop 183 msg
It is not possible to drop a reply from reply_route - you can
change the
reply, but not to drop it entirely.
bogdan
ks lf wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
SIP termination Gateway send two 183 "Session
in Progress"
msg back to SER, first one without SDP, second one with SDP (
for remote ring back tone purpose ), but this crashed the
caller party sip phone somehow, how can we drop the first 183
msg in SER.CFG? We just need forward the second 183 msg to
caller party, but don't forwarding the first one, how to
porgram onreply_route part? just use break sentense doesn't
help. Thanks your great help.
Regards,
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers