Re: [Serusers] How to avoid calling route() in a failure_route block?

route can be called from failure_route. Just make sure your function is safe (i.e a failure_route will on a parallell fork be called several times with different messages) g-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Klein" <tkpublic(a)timklein.fastmail.fm> To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 01:12 AM Subject: [Serusers] How to avoid calling route() in a failure_route block? > I have an unusual need: If a contact in the usrloc database is > unreachable for any reason, I must immediately delete it from the > usrloc > database. I know how to do the deletion, but I don't know the right > way > to write my configuration script. > > Below is the script that I want to write. But I think it won't work, > because I think it's illegal for a failure_route block to call a > route() > command. (Am I correct about that?) > > Can anyone tell me what I should do instead of the following? > > Thank you in advance! > > Tim > > ============== > > route { > > [...irrelevant stuff omitted...] > > if (method==INVITE) { > route(1); > } > } > > route[1] { > if (lookup("location")) { > t_on_failure("99"); > t_relay(); > } else { > t_reply("404","Not Found"); > } > } > > failure_route[99] { > delete_location_from_usrloc(); # I will write this function. > route(1); > } > > ============== > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers