21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
10:54 p.m.
Hello,
On 03/21/07 21:44, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Some time ago, I tried to compile Openser for 64 bits, but I had
problems with libradiusclient, when It was compiled for 64 bits.
Is that problem solved? Could I run Openser + MySQL + Radius support
compiled as 64 bit?
haven't tried myself, but as I could see, there were
several fixes for
libradiusclient on 64b. You should give another try.
Cheers,
Daniel
Kind regards.
Sergio G.
On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <daniel(a)voice-system.ro
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>> wrote:
Hello,
On 03/21/07 20:14, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
T1 1.2
specifications,
Hi Daniel.
I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a
better performance.
A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS
runs on
a 64 bit machine. Was the compilation done to
generate a 64 bit
executable?
yes, it was 64bit executable. OS is Debian amd64.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks.
Kind regards.
Sergio Gutierrez
On 3/21/07, *Sergio Gutierrez* <saguti(a)gmail.com
<mailto:saguti@gmail.com>
<mailto:saguti@gmail.com
<mailto:saguti@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thanks for your answer.
My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my
UAS, as
described is another instance of Openser.
I will try what you sugest.
Thanks.
Sergio Gutiérrez.
On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <
daniel(a)voice-system.ro
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
Hello,
do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS
is another
openser with just sending a 200 ok reply
or sipp with uas
scenario?
First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very
simple
config
with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start
sipp. See
what results you get and that should be the reference
for sipp
capacity.
Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different
servers, see
if you get the cumulative value better.
The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel
execution of
openser processes has some impact as
well.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire
T2000
running
code for my
Solaris 10.
Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC
Systems, and
> used the recommended settings to generate accurate Processor
(UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance
tests are
> just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
>
> My setup is the following:
>
> Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC GHZ 6 Core.
USE_MCAST,
UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB
RAM, 4 UlraSPARC
III+ 900 Mhz
> Software versions listed as on the webpage.
>
> openser -V output:
> version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE
262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
svnrevision: unknown
@(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
I would thank any idea about how could I improve the
performnace of my
> setup. I think that because of the hardware the result
> should be at least equal than listed.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Sergio Gutiérrez.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
<mailto:Users@openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>>