27 Feb
2008
27 Feb
'08
3:51 p.m.
Hi,
If get_redirect() is already pushing the contacts as branches,
then what is the purpose / benefit / drawback of doing something like
this:
taken from sipwise online config:
if(!get_redirects("1:1"))
{
xlog("L_ERROR", "Failed to fetch contact '$ct' from
301/302 - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
acc_db_request("480", "acc");
t_reply("480", "Temporarily Unavailable");
exit;
}
# get last URI from destination-set and set it as R-URI
avp_delete("$avp(s:tmp)/g");
$avp(s:tmp) = $ds;
avp_subst("$avp(s:tmp)", "/.*(sip:.+@[^:;>]+).*$/\1/");
avp_pushto("$ru", "$avp(s:tmp)");
I'd greatly appreciate your answers as they will help me better
understand the use of branches/destination set.
Thanks.
--
Zahid
On Feb 25, 2008, at 7:04 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Tobias,
get_redirects() already pushes the contacts as branches, so I'm afraid
you cannot change them anymore.....
And even if you try yo change the 3xx reply in on_reply route (before
failure route), the changes will not be vizible in failure route...
Regards,
Bogdan
Tobias Lindgren wrote:
Hello,
yes I'm using that one. What I'm trying to do is to rewrite the
hostpart of the URI after doing get_redirects, but preferrably only
after 302s with a special number.
Br,
/Tobias
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu said the following on 2008-02-19 17:00:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Hi Tobias,
Have you looked at the uac_redirect module first?
Regards,
Bogdan
Tobias Lindgren wrote:
Bogdan,
can you please hint me of a way to make decisions with the
information in the 302? Could I use the "on_reply"-route for this
or
am I still only re-processing INVITEs there aswell?
Br,
/Tobias
Tobias Lindgren said the following on 2008-02-15 15:28:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> cool, didn't know that, thanks!
>
> Br,
> /Tobias
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu said the following on 2008-02-15 15:26:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> It is nothing bogus or funny :)...
>>
>> Shortly, in failure route, you re-process the original INVITE
>> (and
>> not the reply that trigger the route). So you will see the source
>> ip of the request ;).
>>
>> For more on this, see the admin training material :
>> http://www.voice-sistem.ro/downloads/2007.08.29-Admin-Course/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>> Tobias Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I was trying to do this in OpenSER 1.2.2:
>>> failure_route[1] {
>>> if (t_check_status("302")){
>>> xlog("L_ERR", "302 source ip address is $si");
>>> if (src_ip == 192.168.5.1) {
>>> # Do something
>>> };
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>> But the proxy sending the 302 (192.168.5.1) is not the one who
>>> ends up in my logs, instead my sip-server (192.168.1.1) who
>>> initiated the call ends up in the log.
>>>
>>> "302 source ip address is 192.168.1.1".
>>>
>>> Have I understood the "$si" psuedo variable wrong? Can I find
>>> the
>>> correct source address of the 302-message somehow?
>>>
>>> Br,
>>> /Tobias
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.openser.org
>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>