Forcing SER to do stuff in order to fix problem UA implementation, I don't
think this is a good approach. Using FQDN as connection information in SDP
is the recommended approach in RFC 2327, though few UA do this. I would
suggest you contact the vendor to fix the UA that can't work with DNS.
Have a look on the fix_nated_sdp() function in nathelper. I haven't tried
this before but it might work. However, there is no guarantee. Let us know
if it works.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerhard Zweimüller
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2005 11:07 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] DNS Resolution of SDP-"Connection Address" at SER
Hi Serusers,
I have a problem with DNS resolution in SIP/SDP "Connection
Information"
/ "ConnectionAddress". Maybe somebody can help me:
In the network we use SIP-UAs that are integrated into
ADSL-Modems from
Allied Telesyn (AT RG 634).
The SIP-client itself works OK. But when the unit is given a
system-name
in the configuration, it will always use its DNS-name instead of its
IP-addr as "Connection Address" in the "Connection
Information" in SDP
in INVITE and corresponding OK messages.
Now we want to add SIP-UAs that are NOT capable of resolving
DNS-Names
in the "Connection Address" field.
Alle messages pass through SER of course and the SDP-part so
far remains
unchanged.
Now my question to the list:
Is there a simple way of forcing SER to do the DNS-resolution of in
incoming message, put in the IP-address in "Connection Address" and
forward it to the other UA?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Gerhard
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers