Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
not sure about this. If you do serial forking, the reply selected to be sent back to the UAC is only from the last serial step. So if you have a first serial step ended with 302 and a second one ended with 486, the 486 (if no other code is forced from script) will be sent to the UAC.
It seems like it happens only in some special circumstances that the 302 is passed back. I'll have to dig a little bit deeper into that...
Thanks, Andy