20 Nov
2005
20 Nov
'05
8:46 a.m.
From what I have seen, the companies are protected mainly by symmetric
NAT (more secure). In residential premises, it is hard to detect, there
are a lot of devices. Sometimes the STUN implementation in the clients
is broken, and do not help at all to label a NAT from SIP server side.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/19/05 01:36, Tavis P wrote:
I'm trying to find some statistics as to what the
ratio of Cone vs
Symmetric NAT solutions deployed in the world are, has anyone done some
research into this?
I'm curious what percentage of users in certain demographics (broadband
clients, for example) i can expect to be serviced using STUN alone, so i
can come up with some figure to help me build out my network
Even just some anecdotal information of peoples experiences would be
very useful
Tavis
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users