IMHO, siproxd is not suited for a far-end NAT traversal scenario and certainly not capable
of scaling if you have a large user community. It is suitable (and made) as a way to
simplify traversal through firewalls in the corporate network and can be used standalone
to handle
mydomain.com calls (company internal and email-based calls).
With ser, I assume it can be used to move the NAT issue from centrally managed closer to
the user community. It may make sense to in some scenarios if the corporation is not
ready to upgrade the FW to one with SIP ALG or upon up lots of ports.
Summary:
- If you are on the inside of the FW (i.e. you are the corporation), siproxd should do
fine
- If you provide services to the corporation and the ser is on the outside, it should be
installed on a case by case basis (some FWs have SIP ALG already)
- If you provide single user services and they happen to be behind corporate FWs, forget
about siproxd
g-)
----- Original Message -----
From: jeff kwong
To: Serusers
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 06:58 AM
Subject: [Serusers] ser+nat+siproxd+asterisk
Hi Guys!
I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup using SER as
Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open
source ALG and it effectively handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a
seperate mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
UA1--NAT---UA2
and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My question is, from the
experience of other guys here, what do you think is the drawback or advantages of using
SIPROXD together with SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER features like accounting?
Thanks!
_jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers