10 Jun
2008
10 Jun
'08
7:29 p.m.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Johansson Olle E wrote:
10 jun 2008 kl. 18.02 skrev Aymeric Moizard:
Change between last 2 versions are minor: I suspect it's very close from
being complete:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://tools.ietf.…
Anyway, I think it would be good to have a STUN server runing inside
openser no matter this draft is out or not.
tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Yes, that is something I need to fix in that "other b2bua" as well...
I haven't seen
this being used much, but have seen that I can enable it in Eyebeam.
Going to try now.
If I get disconnected from the Internet, you guys know what
happened... :-)
Anyone knows any more about the outbound draft and it's progress
through the IETF? El Tuesday 10 June 2008 13:59:42 Aymeric Moizard
escribió:
Right.
1-> I'm talking about SIP and contact management. (not about RTP).
In this
case, the STUN server must be on the same socket as the SIP server.
This
is planned in 'outbound' draft from ietf.
Stun can work even behind symmetric NAT if the
stun server was
running on the same socket the SIP server is running... I hope
this feature will come soon!
Sure? AFAIK a symmetric NAT not only depends on the destination IP
but also on the port. So unless you have a STUN server listening in
all the ports available for RTP proxing you don't know if STUN will
work. /O
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users