9 Oct
2009
9 Oct
'09
5:25 a.m.
2009/10/9 Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net>et>:
6 okt 2009 kl. 19.18 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
What does "without SIMPLE" mean?
I will no accept such kind of "hack" (a multiprotocol client). SIMPLE
is capable of offering similar services as XMPP does. Just
implementations are needed. And this will never achieved if we insist
on using XMPP "because SIMPLE is not mature yet".
Just my opinion. Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Attached the architecture of XMPP and SIMPLE (OMA
specifications) for a
presence environment.
THere's also a draft and a proposal for a new wg that tries to resolve
issues between SIP and XMPP (without SIMPLE) on the client side, without
messing with gateways.