29 Apr
2016
29 Apr
'16
7:23 p.m.
Hello,
got distracted by other tasks and upcoming kamailio world stuff ...
So you got it working now, right?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28/04/16 19:22, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
Hello Daniel
After all Kamailio was not calling set_contact_alias
on reply received from itself. So in reply_route block calling
following code
resolved the issue.
if (src_ip == "KAMAILIO_IP_ADDRESS" && status ==
"200") {
if ($fU == "click2call") {
set_contact_alias();
}
}
Thank you for your helps and your understanding.
Best wishes
Huseyin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:20 PM, huseyin kalyoncu <hkalyoncu(a)gmail.com
<mailto:hkalyoncu@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Daniel
I forgot to mention when I sent the capture file.
There is only single Kamailio instance running but It listens
multiple ports.
5090 for outside traffic and 5060 for inside traffic (other
Kamailio servers, FS servers, etc.)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:49 PM, huseyin kalyoncu
<hkalyoncu(a)gmail.com <mailto:hkalyoncu@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Daniel
Attachment is the full ngrep output for the sample call.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
can you make the full ngrep trace for the call (from
initial invite sent by kamailio, with all following sip
messages) and send it over here?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 17:16, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Hello Daniel
I did some more tests and my previous statement is wrong.
Actually it do call set_contact_alias on 200 reply for
INVITEs
but somehow it has no change.
I really missing something here.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:35 PM, huseyin kalyoncu
<hkalyoncu(a)gmail.com <mailto:hkalyoncu@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Daniel
You are right. 200OK messages are also with private IPs.
I think the problem is that
since I call dlg_bridge with Kamailio's own IP
It sends INVITE messages to itself first then it
routes INVITE msg to user location.
Because of this i see two record routes in the INTIVE
headers and 200 reply headers.
if (is_reply()) {
if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) {
if(is_first_hop())
set_contact_alias();
}
}
But according to this code in NATMANAGE block, it
only set contact if it is first hope.
Since these messages have two record routes, this
code block does not modify contact field
Am I right? or Am I missing something else?
Thanks
Huseyin
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hello,
dlg_bridge is not using the location table at
all, because it has to use the contact from 200ok
of INVITE.
Have you used set_contact_alias() for natted
200ok received for INVITE?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 11:15, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello Daniel
This is the sample output from our location table;
kamailio=# select
username,contact,received,user_agent from
location where username='5678*0012';
username | contact |
received | user_agent
-----------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
5678*0012 | sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090
<mailto:0012@192.168.1.21:5090> |
sip:DEVICE_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 | Cisco/SPA504G-7.6.1
(1 row)
After calling dlg_bridge Kamailio firing INVITE
and rings the device.
After answering on this device Kamailio firing
REFER message.
But as you can see from ngrep output below,
Kamailio is trying to send this message to
address in the contact field which is a private IP.
U 2016/04/27 10:58:25.745935
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 ->
192.168.1.21:5090 <http://192.168.1.21:5090>
REFER sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090
<mailto:0012@192.168.1.21:5090> SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.1c5e622e4af6b7b6c9ede7ade4a50bf8.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.c8a54413000000000000000000000000.0.
To:
<sip:5678*0012@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=199aaa02310a0799i1.
From:
<sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=0d71401ca91009b00be5953e2813d7e4-7471.
CSeq: 11 REFER.
Call-ID:
63dc8c8a5ea88a30-868@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Max-Forwards: 69.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: Kamailio.
Referred-By: sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Refer-To: sip:5678*0002@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Contact:
<sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5060>.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:47 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
can you send the ngrep trace for such case?
I would like to look at the headers to
understand properly what do you mean.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/04/16 15:23, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello
I am trying to implement click 2 call
functionality on Kamailio with dlg_bridge.
But It seems that Kamailio routes REFER
messages to devices according to Contact
field of location table instead of Received
field.
But if the the IP in the Contact field is
private REFER messages are failing so
does the dlg_bridge.
I called dlg_bridge in the config like this:
dlg_bridge("sip:$param1", "sip:$param2",
"sip:IP_ADDRESS_OF_KAMAILIO:5060");
It rings the device in $param1 but after
answering on that device
Kamailio fails to send REFER if the Contact
field for that device is Private IP.
So it fails to initiate a call.
How can I force Kamailio to use Received
field for REFER messages instead of Contact
field?
Thanks
Huseyin
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users