7 Jul
2013
7 Jul
'13
7:53 p.m.
Hi,
On 07/07/2013 11:19 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:01:28PM -0400, Nick Khamis
wrote:
If it's behind a DNAT like on Amazon EC2, it could make sense.
Andreas
Can we run it behind nat? I've really been
eyeing that and desparate
to replace rtpproxy
Think twice ... trying to run something designed to avoid problems
with NAT behing NAT? ... doesn't sound good at all ...