24 Aug
2009
24 Aug
'09
11:44 a.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
What I don't understand is the reasons to make current SR working with K and S features/modules compatibility. We don't need a SR working solution right now (since Kamailio and SER do exist), do we?. Wouldn't be better to spent devel time in porting the required K/S modules to SR instead of making them working as K/S modules in any way?
I think the idea is that SR is a common layer - sort of like a kernel - from which subsequent features are derived in both K and S.
What this fails to explain in any way is what the intended applications of K vs. SR are from an end-user perspective.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671