2 Feb
2011
2 Feb
'11
5:21 a.m.
Would be possible.
Have a look at DRBD!
Von: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
Im Auftrag von Danny Dias
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011 11:20
An: kamailio
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Redundancy between 2 Kamailio servers
Hello,
I was thinking that if i store the contacts that are registered into my proxy in a
database, like this:
.
.
# ----- usrloc params -----
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3)
.
.
if (is_method("REGISTER"))
{
if (!save("location"))
sl_reply_error();
exit;
}
.
.
This way i would store the contacts in table "location", and then i could make a
backup of the DB and restore on the other server...is that ok? or i'm missing
something?
Thanks in advance for your help!
2011/1/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
2011/1/27 Danny Dias <ing.diasdanny(a)gmail.com>om>:
As I said at the top of my previous mail:
HeartBeat (as it is the only
I'm used to).
Could be, or not. It doesn't matter too much.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Two Kamailios
in a HeartBeat cluster which manages the kamailio
service along with a virtual IP in which kamailios are supposed to
listen. Just one kamailio is running (HA manages them).
So, the heartbeat cluster shall manage that both are ok and also check that
the virtual ip and the kamailio service in the primary server is OK....if
something fails it will activate the virtual IP address and the kamailio
process in the other server? so this heartbeat cluster is installed in both
kamailio servers?
which HA software do you recommend? Regsitration
can be done in a shared database with db_mode=3 (or 2) so
no locations are lost when HA stops the running instance of kamailio
(or the server is down) and starts kamailio in the other cluster node.
So, the database of the kamailios should be dedicated and externalised
server?