Hi Juha,
Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 then 192.168.26.6. So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , 192.168.26.6. Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , 192.168.26.6. If as you're saying it's sorting issue , then why I got 192.168.26.6 gateway twice (at the first and at the end).
Regards, Ali
-----Original Message----- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Juha Heinanen Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 10:17 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices
Ali Taher writes:
Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway comes first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
hard to say anything based on the information you gave. smaller tuple priority value means higher priority.
-- juha
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users