Andreas Granig writes:
I fully agree that TCP (as a first step) should be a good improvement. We've already briefly talked about redesigning the overall rtpproxy control protocol some time ago, but we haven't had the time yet to start with it, however we've it on our list for December.
ok, good to hear.
Most likely we're going to start with forking the rtpproxy module in a separate feature branch, do a proof-of-concept implementation and preferably merge it back to trunk rtpproxy module once all 3 media proxies (rtpproxy, iptrtpproxy, mediaproxy-ng) are supporting this protocol.
it may never happen that all different rtpproxies support a new protocol. better to introduce new rtpproxy-ng module once you have the new protocol up and running.
-- juha