7 Aug
2012
7 Aug
'12
12:32 p.m.
AVPs are associated with the transaction. If you "spiral" a request
through the same proxy, then for the proxy it is a new transaction.
Thus, when processing the request a second time, there is a new
transaction and you do not have access to the AVPs of the previous
transaction.
Workarounds are:
- store data in SIP headers and retrieve it later (ugly)
- use htable module to store data during transaction 1 and retrieve it
during transaction 2. Therefore you need a known "key" which is
identical in this 2 transactions only (e.g. use "$ci$ft" as base for the
key).
regards
Klaus
On 07.08.2012 00:27, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Hello,
I am curious if there is any documentation on how AVP's processing
works in the following scenario below.
UAC 1 -> KAMAILIO -> KAMAILIO -> DEST
It seems that AVP's I set between UAC 1 -> KAMAILIO are lost once I
relay back to the same KAMAILIO proxy (self)?
Is there any documentation on why or when this would occur?
Is there a better way to handle such a scenario? i.e. more dynamic
internal routing, vs relaying to self.
Thanks as always in advance!
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users