Re: [Users] SER as loadbalancer and NAT

Hi Klaus!

Klaus Darilion wrote:

...

I wonder if there are known side effects if I use fix_nated_contact() in combination with nat_flag in the registrar module instead of fix_nated_register() to save NATed contacts?

I think the only limitation is, that the SIP client sees a modified URI in incoming INVITE requests and in the 200 Ok responses for the REGISTER messages. I guess most clients do not care, but AFAI remember there was a posting that a client did not accept the 200 Ok reponse with the modified contact.

I faintly remembered this discussion, thus the question.

But I see this approach isn't RFC compliant, so maybe it's better to forget this hack and go for a clean Path-Header solution...

Andy