6 Sep
2003
6 Sep
'03
2:36 a.m.
Please disregard this - further investigation showed that the SER does
all correctly, it was an error in our IVR script which for some reason
takes value from the To field as a DNIS.
-Maxim
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Folks,
We came over the problem with on-failure processing. In a nutshell our
config looks like the following:
route {
if (method == "INVITE") {
rewriteuser("345678");
rewritehostport("1.1.1.1:5060");
t_on_failure("1");
t_relay();
break;
};
}
failure_route[1] {
rewritehostport("2.2.2.2:5060");
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
The problem is that if transaction to 1.1.1.1 fails and we are
initiating another transaction to 2.2.2.2, the username part of requiest
URI sent to 2.2.2.2 is original one, not "345678", as it could be
expected.
Any ideas?
-Maxim
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers