19 Feb
2008
19 Feb
'08
1:28 p.m.
Hi Juha,
I was digging in Stevens, for there were no restriction for setsockopt() with SO_KEEPALIVE - do you have other info on this topic?
Regards, Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
This will be definitely a better solution as it will be more efficient from load point of view - the question is how portable (general supported) is the TCP keepalive setting - this will need some investigation.
TCP keepalives are not supported by all all OSes. it should not prevent using it in those that do.
-- juha