14 Oct
2005
14 Oct
'05
5:36 p.m.
i understand, minisip softphone can initiate TLS connection.
and it can be authenticated by the openser via digest authentication.
is it possible to use certificate instead of digest authentication?
--
Girish
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 08:28 +0000, users-request(a)openser.org wrote:
> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> users(a)openser.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> users-request(a)openser.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-owner(a)openser.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Re: [Serusers] trusting peers (Juha Heinanen)
> 2. Re: different tables for acc (Klaus Darilion)
> 3. Re: Improving TLS implementation (Cesc)
> 4. Re: Improving TLS implementation (Juha Heinanen)
> 5. Softphones compatible with Openser/TLS (Joonbum Byun)
> 6. Re: Softphones compatible with Openser/TLS (Klaus Darilion)
> 7. Re: Softphones compatible with Openser/TLS (Cesc)
> 8. Re: BYE method accompanied by error (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
> 9. Re: How to do RADIUS authentication with hashed password (MD5
> or HA1)? (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:55:37 +0300
> From: Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>
> Subject: Re: [Users] Re: [Serusers] trusting peers
> To: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
> Cc: Nils Ohlmeier <lists(a)ohlmeier.org>rg>, serusers(a)iptel.org, Jan Janak
> <jan(a)iptel.org>rg>, "users openser.org" <users(a)openser.org>
> Message-ID: <17230.15657.441146.200770(a)rautu.tutpro.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Klaus Darilion writes:
>
> > e.g. simmilar to allow_trusted, but using the domain form the
> > certificate instead of using src_ip.
>
> yes, it would be easy to add such a check to permissions module.
>
> -- juha
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:30:46 +0200
> From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
> Subject: Re: [Users] different tables for acc
> To: jayesh nambiar <jayesh_1017(a)yahoo.com>
> Cc: SER <users(a)openser.org>
> Message-ID: <434E5376.2000902(a)pernau.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> No. Only one table for all costumers.
>
> klaus
>
> jayesh nambiar wrote:
> > hi all,
> > I came to kno about the parameter modparam("acc",
"db_table_acc",
> > "acc_table").
> > Does this mean that I can have different acc tables for my different
> > type of customers. Is this possible.
> > If yes, then how? If i declare the appropriate flag and then use setflag
> > at the places i want to account, will it work.
> > Can someone please explain it to me. Any suggestions would help me a lot.
> > Thanx
> > jayesh
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> >
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:53:25 +0200
> From: Cesc <cesc.santa(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Users] Improving TLS implementation
> To: Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>
> Cc: SER-Users <serusers(a)iptel.org>rg>, OpenSER-users <users(a)openser.org>
> Message-ID:
> <ce8208420510130553r371591aeib5f43a7674b109b(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Juha,
> Well, that is true, but what do you propose then? just present a host cert
> and nothing else? I would say that if the company trust the hosting for
> running the service, a mere certficate should not be the problem, should it?
> Cesc
>
> On 10/13/05, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
> >
> > cesc,
> >
> > you made a good summary, but in multi-domain case, it is not just a
> > technical problem on how to present or offer a domain specific
> > certificate. in order to be able to do that, the domains have to
> > surrender their private keying information to a provider that currently
> > happens to host their sip service, and to another provider that hosts
> > their web service, and to third provider that hosts their e-commerce
> > service, etc.
> >
> > in most cases, this is simply out of question. companies are not going
> > to do it.
> >
> > -- juha
> >
>