At 12:53 22/11/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote: ...
Let me compare with cars. ser is the much more fast car then openser, but with openser I can drive the shortest route whereas with ser I had to drive weird routes because of missing functions.
I believe that naming such functionality would help in this kind of sessions. (I have my wish list for both, as well.)
Just curious what your "wish list" is?
But I'm still not sure whether there got to be an open feature list and a roadmap for SER.
Actually a roadmap suggestion is in the ottendorf release announcement http://www.iptel.org/new_major_ser_pre_release_ottendorf_is_out_for_testing It is kind of testing balloon -- wondering if people would like to comment on it.
Probably this is getting better with the select framework in Ottendorf - if only I could understand it.
I find it pretty easy to use, but I join you in denouncing that the documentation is lagging behind, something that becomes chronic for SER;
badly, I have to join you too :-) anyhow, if you occur to have some examples or text to share, that would be just fantastic.
Also I recall you once mentioned some fast-usrloc-loading feature in an email I can't find -- could you share with me what this actually is?
thanks!
-jiri
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/